Objection: Disgust, Morality, and the Law

By Debra Lieberman (Author)

Published on July 3, 2018 by Oxford University Press

In this profound exploration of human emotion and its influence on legal systems, psychologists Debra Lieberman and Carlton Patrick delve into the complex relationship between disgust, morality, and law. Through a meticulous examination of how our most primal emotions shape societal norms and legal frameworks, they challenge readers to question whether reason truly guides legislation or if disgust often dictates what is deemed acceptable.

The authors begin by addressing age-old ethical dilemmas, such as why incest between consenting adults who cannot have children remains illegal. They also explore contemporary issues like the regulation of speech, arguing that certain words are frequently censored under the guise of protecting public morality. By tracing the evolutionary and psychological roots of disgust—from ancient survival instincts to modern moral judgments—they reveal how this basic human emotion has been co-opted by legal systems to create a hierarchy of acceptable versus taboo behaviors.

Lieberman and Patrick dissect a range of controversial laws, from those against practices like corpse desecration and bestiality to more contentious prohibitions such as homosexuality and the use of pornography. Their analysis uncovers how these seemingly arbitrary bans have their origins in deeply ingrained disgust responses, which continue to influence legal decisions even in an increasingly secular society.

Written with a keen awareness of current events, Objection presents a compelling argument for a more rational approach to lawmaking. The authors advocate for a system that separates the emotional reactions of disgust from objective ethical considerations, ensuring that laws are based on reason rather than irrational repulsion. Through their incisive critique, Lieberman and Patrick provide valuable insights into the human condition and the ongoing struggle between emotion and justice.